4 Comments

  1. hermi
    July 10, 2004 @ 4:51 pm

    The last I heard, the Green Party wasn’t even letting Nader run on their ticket this year. I miss the comfort of the 96 election when we were able to vote Nader to our hearts content without worrying that Clinton would fail to be re-elected.

    Reply

    • keentonchiang
      July 18, 2004 @ 10:07 pm

      People in California can still vote for Nader this year. Despite a Republican governor, California will still go to the Democrats. Therefore, Californians can vote for any 3rd party candidate without much fear that Kerry-Edwards will lose Cali’s electoral college votes.

      If Dean was the Democratic nominee, I would’ve voted for him. Since I don’t like Kerry, and the state is going to him anyways, I will be casting my ballot for Nader this November to help him get the 5% goal.

      Reply

  2. kuroikirin
    July 10, 2004 @ 7:01 pm

    The Green candidate this time around lives in Eureka. I can’t remmeber his name, though, and my first election jaded me too much to really care. How sad.

    Reply

    • keentonchiang
      July 18, 2004 @ 10:11 pm

      California voters really can’t do too much about the 2000 election. According to Michael Moore’s documentary, the Republican’s knew ahead of time that Florida was going to be a critical battleground state. So, the Florida debacle was out of Californian’s hands.

      However, since California’s electoral college will most likely go to the Democrats this year, I can safely vote my conscience this year when I cast my ballot for Nader. I want to help him get closer to the 5% goal so he can be a major contender in the 2008 elections.

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

%d bloggers like this: